Vioxx Lawyers - Side Effects, Recall, Lawsuit
Vioxx Claims Question? Get Answer, Free.
  HOME   ABOUT US   VIOXX RESOURCES   FAQ's VIOXX NEWS CONTACT US September 10, 2010
Small Business Lawyers Image
 
 
Selecting an attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney in your area:
 

Washington DC Vioxx Lawyer


< Back to Washington DC Vioxx Resources

Playgirl.com Operators to Pay $30 Million to Settle FTC Charges

Agency Alleged Adult Web Sites Illegally Billed Consumers for Web Access Advertised as Free

The owners and operators of www.playgirl.com, www.highsociety.com and scores of other adult entertainment Web sites will pay $30 million to settle Federal Trade Commission and New York State's Attorney General's charges that they illegally billed thousands of consumers for services that were advertised as "free," and billed other consumers who never visited the Web sites at all. The settlement bars the illegal practices in the future, and requires that the defendants post a bond - $2 million for the corporate defendants and $500,000 each for the individual defendants - before they are allowed to continue to market adult entertainment on the Internet.

In August, 2000, the FTC and the New York Attorney General filed suit in U.S. District Court seeking to halt the illegal billing practices. The suit named New York-based Crescent Publishing Group, Inc., its principals, Bruce Chew and David Bernstein, and 64 affiliated corporations that operate the adult entertainment Web sites. According to the complaint, the defendants operated scores of adult entertainment Web sites, deceptively promoting them as "free." The "Free Tour Web Sites" claimed that consumers' credit card numbers were required solely to prove that the consumers were of legal age to view the adult material, and that the credit cards would not be billed. Consumers complained, however, that their cards were billed despite the representations, and other consumers were billed even though they did not visit the defendants' Web sites. Thousands of consumers were charged recurring monthly membership fees ranging from $20 to $90, the complaint alleged. Consumers who tried to dispute the charges were met with a variety of barriers designed by the defendants to thwart their efforts. According to the complaint, the defendants used billing names different than the names of the Web sites, so consumers often had no idea who was billing them or why. Moreover, consumers often had difficulty contacting the defendants to get refunds from the information provided to them on their billing statement.

The Court issued a preliminary injunction that required clear and conspicuous disclosure of charges for any "free" tour of their Web sites and barred the defendants from "charging, debiting or billing consumers" for any Web site services without first obtaining a $10 million bond that could be used "to satisfy any judgment entered against the defendants," following trial. The settlement announced today concludes the case without further litigation.

The settlement bars the defendants from making any misrepresentations in advertising, promoting, offering for sale or selling any products or services. Specifically, it bars them from making misrepresentations about the cost and terms of Web site access, and deceptive representations that credit account information will be used only for age verification. It further bars them from billing any consumers without their prior authorization and requires clear disclosure regarding the amount consumers will be charged and procedures for cancellation before consumers sign up for membership at defendants' sites. If the defendants continue to advertise "free tours" of their adult sites, the settlement requires clear and conspicuous disclosure about: how consumers can exit their sites without incurring charges; when the "free tour" has ended; and that by continuing, consumers will incur fees. The settlement also requires payment of $30 million for consumer redress. In the event that redress proves impractical, the $30 million in ill-gotten gains will be divided equally and turned over to the United States Treasury and the State of New York. The corporate defendants will be required to obtain bonds in the amount of $2 million before marketing adult entertainment on the Internet in the future. Each individual defendant will be required to obtain a bond in the amount of $500,000. Finally, the settlement contains record keeping provisions to allow the FTC to monitor compliance.


Contact Washington DC Vioxx Attorneys



Contact an Vioxx Attorney for the following Washington DC cities:

If you or anyone you know has taken Vioxx and has experienced difficulties due to the drug, contact our vioxx lawyer and receive a free case evaluation.

 

Latest Vioxx News
 
Merck Study On The Painkiller Drug Vioxx
4woman.gov, May 24, 2006 Merck is facing about 10,000 lawsuits over Vioxx...
Read more >

Vioxx Court Cases
jpml.uscourts.gov, Mar 01, 2006 The pending motions encompassing the 158 actions listed on Schedule A will be set for the next...
Read more >

More Vioxx News>


 
Regional Resources
 
Search for Vioxx resources in your State:

Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Lousiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Mass Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming

Browse Map >
 
     
 
Vioxx Hot Topics
 
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx Side Effects
Vioxx & Heart Attack
Vioxx Withdrawal
Vioxx Warning
Vioxx Refund

 
  Vioxx Resources  
 
Vioxx Facts & Information
Vioxx Links
Vioxx Audio & Videos
Drug Definitions/Abbr.
The US Federal Code
Vioxx Laws

More Vioxx Resources >

 
  Did You Know?  
   
 
 


Legal Disclaimers

All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a refferal or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Vioxx Recalls.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional
Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.